1. Welcome
The Documentation Compliance Checker is the One Care Portal module for reviewing documentation before someone else does. Inside the portal it is labelled Documentation Intelligence, which is the name you will see on screen and in the steps below. You upload charts, service notes, contact notes, plans of care, or any other record as a PDF. The module compares each PDF with the review criteria your organization has written and flags possible documentation gaps, quoting the text it relied on and the page it found it on. A reviewer on your team then checks each flag against the source document and records what your organization decided.
Agencies use it for monthly chart audits, pre-billing documentation checks, supervisor quality reviews, and audit preparation. The line that appears on every screen sums up how it works: AI-assisted review. Human-controlled decisions.
What it does not do. Documentation Intelligence does not certify or determine compliance, billability, fraud, or clinical or legal sufficiency. A flag is a prompt for a person to look, not a finding of noncompliance. AI-generated review signals require human verification against the source document and applicable guidance.
What You Can Do
- Set up programs and criteria — write the checks that matter for each program or document type you review.
- Upload PDFs — one or many at a time, up to 20 MB each.
- Run AI analysis — each PDF is checked against the program's criteria in the background.
- Review flags beside the document — jump straight to the cited page and compare.
- Record decisions — confirm, dismiss, or mark each flag addressed, then complete, return, or escalate the review.
- Track and report — see what is waiting, which criteria are flagged most often, and export to CSV.
Key Terms
| Term | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Program | A named set of review criteria, usually one per service line, waiver, or document type (for example “Monthly Contact Notes”). Every upload is assigned to one program. |
| Criterion | One check within a program. It has a code, a title, a category, a severity, and reviewer guidance that tells the AI what to look for. |
| Criteria revision | The version number of a program. It goes up by one each time the program is saved. |
| Analysis | One AI review of one PDF against the program's criteria at that moment. A document can be analyzed more than once. |
| Flag | A criterion the AI believes may not be met, shown with an explanation, quoted evidence, and a page number. |
| Disposition | The human decision on a single flag: confirmed, dismissed, or marked addressed. |
| Final decision | The human outcome for the whole document: review completed, returned for follow-up, or escalated. |
In short: a program holds criteria; an analysis checks one PDF against them and raises flags; a reviewer gives each flag a disposition and the document a final decision.
This guide covers Documentation Intelligence only. Separate guides are available for Case Management, the Care Module, and Billing Hub.
2. Getting Started
Opening the Module
- Log in to your organization's One Care Portal. You land on the Service Overview dashboard.
- Find the Documentation Intelligence card and click Open Documentation Intelligence.
- The module opens on the Review Queue.
If Documentation Intelligence is the only module you have access to, you skip the Service Overview and go straight to the Review Queue after logging in.
If you do not see the card, either the module has not been switched on for your organization or you have not been given a Documentation Intelligence role. The module is enabled for each organization by One Care Portal; roles are assigned by your organization's administrator. See Roles & Permissions.
Finding Your Way Around
Four links appear at the top of every Documentation Intelligence page:
| Link | What It Is For | Who Sees It |
|---|---|---|
| Review Queue | The list of uploaded documents and where each one stands. This is the landing page. | Everyone with access |
| Upload | Add PDFs and start analysis. | Full access only |
| Review Insights | Summary numbers and trends across documents. | Everyone with access |
| Programs & Criteria | Create and edit programs and their review criteria. | Full access only |
The Review Queue and Review Insights are available to everyone with access. Upload and Programs & Criteria appear only for users who can make changes.
First-Time Setup
Nothing is pre-loaded. A new organization starts with no programs and no criteria, and nobody can upload until at least one program exists. Before your first upload:
- Open Programs & Criteria and click New program (see Programs & Criteria).
- Give the program a name and add at least one criterion.
- Click Save program.
- Go to Upload. The program now appears in the Program list.
3. Roles & Permissions
Your organization's administrator assigns Documentation Intelligence roles under Manage Users. There are two roles:
| Role | What It Allows |
|---|---|
| Documentation Intelligence Access | Full use of the module: upload PDFs, run and re-run analysis, create and edit programs and criteria, record decisions, view insights, and export CSV files. |
| Documentation Intelligence View Only | Read-only: open the Review Queue, open any document and see its flags and decision history, view Review Insights, and export CSV files. Cannot upload, analyze, edit criteria, or record decisions. |
- Documentation Intelligence Access — full use of the module, including uploads, analysis, criteria, and decisions.
- Documentation Intelligence View Only — can read everything and export, but cannot change anything.
- Organization administrators have full access without needing either role.
Access is organization-wide. Anyone with either role can see every document uploaded to the module by your organization, not only the ones they uploaded themselves. Keep this in mind when deciding who receives a role.
View-only users do not see the Upload or Programs & Criteria links, and the analysis and decision buttons are hidden for them in the Review Workspace.
4. Programs & Criteria
Documentation Intelligence > Programs & Criteria
A program is the rulebook an upload is checked against. Most organizations create one program per kind of document they review, because a monthly contact note, a plan of care, and a daily attendance record each need different checks.
Creating a Program
- Click New program.
- Enter a Program name (required, up to 150 characters) and, if helpful, a Description.
- Under Review criteria, fill in the first criterion (see the fields below).
- Click Add criterion for each additional check. A program needs at least 1 criterion and can hold up to 100.
- Click Save program.
Criterion Fields
| Field | What to Enter |
|---|---|
| Criterion code | A short identifier that is unique within the program, such as CN-01. It appears in summaries and exports. |
| Criterion | A plain title for the check, such as “Contact date and method documented”. This is the heading reviewers see on a flag. |
| Category | A free-text label for grouping, such as completeness or signatures. It appears in the insights export. |
| Severity | Low, Medium, or High. It sets the badge shown on a flag so reviewers can prioritize. New criteria start at Medium. |
| Reviewer guidance | The instruction the AI follows. Describe what should be in the document and what should be flagged when it is missing. Up to 2,000 characters. |
Each criterion has a Criterion code, a Criterion title, a Category, a Severity (Low, Medium, or High), and Reviewer guidance. The guidance is the most important field: it is the instruction the AI follows.
Writing Good Reviewer Guidance
- One requirement per criterion. “Signature and date present” is easier to review, and to measure, than a criterion that bundles five checks.
- Say what to flag. Describe the gap: “Flag the note if it does not state…”
- Say what counts as acceptable. If a typed name with credentials is acceptable in place of a handwritten signature, say so.
- Use the words that appear in your documents. If your form says “Method of Contact”, use that phrase.
- Ask for gaps, not verdicts. Guidance such as “decide whether this note is compliant” does not work; the module is built to describe documentation gaps, and an analysis that returns a verdict is discarded.
Examples you can adapt. These are illustrations only; base your own criteria on the regulations, payer rules, and policies that apply to your organization.
| Code | Criterion | Severity | Reviewer guidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN-01 | Contact date and method documented | High | Flag the note if it does not state the date of the contact and whether it was face to face, by phone, or by video. |
| CN-02 | Progress toward goals addressed | Medium | Flag the note if it does not describe progress, or lack of progress, toward at least one goal from the person's plan. A general statement such as “doing well” with no reference to a goal should be flagged. |
| CN-03 | Signature, credentials, and date | High | Flag the note if it is missing the author's signature or typed name, their credentials or title, or the date signed. |
| CN-04 | Health, safety, and welfare reviewed | Medium | Flag the note if it does not record whether any health, safety, or welfare concerns were identified during the contact, including a statement that none were identified. |
Editing a Program
Select a program from the list on the left, make your changes, and click Save program. Use Remove to delete a criterion (the last remaining criterion cannot be removed).
Changes create a new revision and apply only to future analyses. Previous review results remain unchanged. Each analysis keeps a copy of the exact criteria it used.
If two people edit the same program at once, the second person to save sees “Someone changed this since you loaded it. The latest version is shown.” Review the latest version and make your change again.
Archiving a Program
Programs cannot be deleted. To retire one, open it and clear the Active: available for new uploads and analyses checkbox, then save. Archiving keeps existing documents, analyses, and decisions. Archived programs cannot receive new uploads or analyses, and they are shown as Archived in the program list and as “(archived)” in filters. Tick the checkbox again to reactivate.
5. Uploading Documents
Documentation Intelligence > Upload
The Upload page walks through three steps on one screen.
- Select program. Choose the program whose criteria should be applied. Only active programs are listed. The page shows the criteria revision and the number of active criteria so you can confirm you picked the right one.
- Add PDFs. Click PDF files and select one or more files. Each file appears in a list with its size.
- Review and upload. Check the summary of program, criteria, and files, then choose one of the two upload buttons.
| Button | What Happens |
|---|---|
| Upload and analyze | Each file is stored and AI analysis starts for it straight away. Use this for normal review work. |
| Upload without analysis | The files are stored only. You can start analysis later by opening each document from the Review Queue. |
Upload and analyze stores each file and starts analysis immediately. Upload without analysis only stores the files, so you can analyze them later from the Review Queue.
File Requirements
- PDF only. Word documents, images, and spreadsheets must be saved or exported as PDF first.
- Up to 20 MB each. Split or compress larger files.
- File names up to 255 characters.
- One document per PDF. Every PDF is analyzed on its own. If you scan a whole chart into a single PDF, it is reviewed as one document.
The program is the only detail recorded with an upload; there are no participant, staff, or date fields. Use clear file names (for example a record number, document type, and month) so documents are easy to find with the file-name search later.
Watching Progress
Each file shows a status as it moves through upload and analysis:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Waiting | Queued. The file is waiting to upload, or has uploaded and is waiting for its analysis to start. |
| Uploading | The file is being sent and stored. |
| Analyzing | AI analysis is running. |
| Ready for review | Analysis finished. Click Open document to start reviewing. |
| Uploaded, not analyzed | The file is stored and no analysis was requested. |
| Failed | Something went wrong. The reason is shown beside the file, with a Retry button where a retry is possible. |
The statuses are Waiting, Uploading, Analyzing, Ready for review, Uploaded, not analyzed, and Failed. When every file has finished, an Open Review Queue link appears.
Stay on the Upload page until every file shows Analyzing or a later status. An analysis that has already started continues on the server if you leave, but files that are still waiting may not be uploaded or analyzed. Any file that was stored without being analyzed appears in the Review Queue as Not started, and you can analyze it from there.
Upload Messages and What to Do
| Message | What to Do |
|---|---|
| Only PDF files can be uploaded. / The file is not a PDF. | Convert the file to PDF and upload it again. Renaming a file to end in .pdf is not enough. |
| PDF files must be 20 MB or smaller. | Reduce the file size or split it into smaller PDFs. |
| The PDF could not be read. It may be damaged or use an unsupported format. | Open the file on your computer to confirm it works, then re-export or re-scan it. |
| This program is archived or no longer exists. | Choose an active program, or reactivate the program under Programs & Criteria. |
| Choose a program and a PDF with a file name of up to 255 characters. | Select a program and shorten the file name. |
| The upload was interrupted before it finished. Upload the file again. | Upload the file again. Nothing from the interrupted attempt was kept. |
| Server is busy; retrying analysis shortly… | No action needed. The page retries automatically. |
6. How Analysis Works
During an analysis the PDF is checked against every active criterion in its program, using the criteria as they stand at that moment. Analysis runs in the background: you can keep working, leave the page, or log out, and it carries on.
Analysis Statuses
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Not started | The document is stored and has never been analyzed. |
| Analyzing | An analysis is running. The Review Workspace and the Upload page check for the result automatically. |
| Analysis complete | A result is available to review. |
| Analysis failed | The last attempt did not produce a result. Nothing from that attempt was saved, and it can be retried. |
A document is Not started, Analyzing, Analysis complete, or Analysis failed. The green “Analysis complete” badge means the step finished; it is not a judgment about the document.
The Review Queue does not refresh itself. Reload the page, or change a filter, to see updated statuses.
Starting, Re-running, and Retrying
Open a document from the Review Queue. The button at the top right of the Review Workspace changes with the document's state:
- Analyze PDF — the document has never been analyzed.
- Re-run analysis — a result exists and you want a fresh one, usually after changing the program's criteria.
- Retry analysis — the last attempt failed or was interrupted.
Re-running creates a new analysis and leaves earlier ones in place. See Recording Decisions for what happens to decisions already recorded.
When an Analysis Fails
A failed analysis shows “The last analysis failed” with a reason. If an earlier analysis completed, it is still shown.
| Reason Shown | What to Do |
|---|---|
| The AI provider did not respond in time. / The AI provider returned an error. | Click Retry analysis. If it keeps happening with one file, try a smaller or cleaner PDF. |
| The AI returned an incomplete or invalid result, so nothing was saved. | Retry. If it repeats, simplify the program's reviewer guidance. |
| The AI cited evidence on a page this document does not have, so nothing was saved. | Retry. The result was discarded because its page reference could not be trusted. |
| The AI described the document with a verdict, such as compliant or billable, instead of documentation gaps, so nothing was saved. | Retry, and check that your reviewer guidance asks what to flag rather than asking for a verdict. |
| The program has no active criteria. / This program is archived or has no active criteria. | Reactivate the program or add criteria under Programs & Criteria. |
| This analysis appears to have been interrupted. | The analysis produced no result within 15 minutes. Click Retry analysis. |
| The server is already running its maximum number of analyses. Try again shortly. | Wait a minute and click the analyze button again. |
| AI analysis is not configured for this environment. | Contact One Care Portal support. |
Most failures are temporary, and Retry analysis resolves them. A failed attempt never leaves a partial result behind.
7. The Review Workspace
Documentation Intelligence > Review Queue > open a document
The Review Workspace puts the source PDF on one side and the AI-generated review flags on the other, so every flag can be checked against the page it refers to. On a narrow screen the two sides become tabs named Document and Review Flags.
The top of the page shows the file name, program, who uploaded it and when, the analysis status, and review progress such as “2 of 5 flags reviewed”.
The Document Viewer
- Previous page / Next page, or type a number in the Page box, to move through the PDF.
- Zoom — Fit width, 100%, or 150%.
- Open opens the PDF in a new browser tab; Download saves a copy.
If the viewer stops loading pages after the workspace has been open for a while, refresh the browser page to reload the document.
The AI Outcome
The summary at the top of the flags panel is tagged AI-generated and shows one of three outcomes:
| Outcome | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No issues flagged | The AI did not flag any of the program's criteria. This is not a statement that the document is compliant; it means nothing was flagged against the criteria you configured. |
| Needs attention | One or more criteria were flagged. The summary lists how many and their codes. |
| Not enough information | The AI could not find enough readable information to review the document, often because of a poor scan or an unrelated document. |
The three outcomes are No issues flagged, Needs attention, and Not enough information. There is no score and no pass or fail result.
Below the outcome you can see when the analysis ran, who started it, and which criteria revision it used. Expand Criteria used in this analysis to see the exact criteria applied, even if the program has been edited since.
Reading a Flag
Only criteria that were flagged are listed, with at most one flag per criterion. Each flag shows:
- The criterion title and a severity badge (low, medium, or high).
- An explanation of the possible gap.
- A Page N button with the quoted evidence. Click it to jump the viewer to that page.
- A Suggested reviewer step.
- The current Human decision for the flag, which reads “Not reviewed yet” until someone records one.
Always read the cited page yourself. The quoted evidence is AI-provided text; the module confirms that the cited page exists, but it does not check the quotation word for word against the PDF.
Earlier Analyses
When a document has been analyzed more than once, an Analysis list appears with the Current analysis and each Earlier one. Earlier analyses are read-only: you can see their flags and decision history, but new decisions apply only to the current analysis.
8. Recording Decisions
Decisions are what turn AI flags into your organization's review record. They are made at two levels: each flag, then the document as a whole.
Step 1: Decide Each Flag
| Button | Use It When | Recorded As |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm flag | You checked the document and agree the gap is real. | Flag confirmed |
| Dismiss flag | The flag is wrong or does not apply; the document does contain what the criterion asks for. | Flag dismissed |
| Mark addressed | The gap was real and has since been corrected or otherwise dealt with. | Marked addressed |
- Confirm flag — the gap is real.
- Dismiss flag — the flag is wrong or does not apply.
- Mark addressed — the gap was real and has been dealt with.
Each button opens a dialog where you can add a Reviewer comment (optional for flags, up to 2,000 characters). Click Record decision to save.
Step 2: Record the Final Decision
| Button | Use It When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Complete review | Every flag has been reviewed and no further action is needed on this document. | Optional |
| Return for follow-up | The document needs to go back to its author or program for correction. | Required |
| Escalate review | The document needs attention from someone with more authority, such as a compliance lead. | Required |
- Complete review — available once every flag has a decision. Until then you see “Review every flag before completing the review” with the number remaining.
- Return for follow-up — requires a comment explaining what needs to be fixed.
- Escalate review — requires a comment explaining why.
Returning or escalating a document records the outcome in One Care Portal. It does not notify anyone or send the document anywhere, so follow your organization's usual process for passing it on.
The final-decision dialog carries this reminder: “This records your organization's review outcome. It does not determine compliance, billability, fraud, or clinical or legal sufficiency.”
Changing a Decision and Viewing History
Decisions are never overwritten. If you record a different decision on the same flag or document, the new one becomes current and the earlier one stays in the record. Expand Disposition history on a flag, or Final decision history at the bottom, to see every decision with who made it, when, and their comment.
Decisions and Re-running Analysis
Re-running analysis starts a fresh review. Earlier decisions stay attached to the earlier analysis, and the document returns to “No decision” until the new flags are reviewed. Decisions cannot be recorded while an analysis is running.
If someone else acted on the document while you had it open, you see “This document changed since you loaded it. The latest version is shown; review it and try again.”
9. The Review Queue
Documentation Intelligence > Review Queue
The Review Queue lists your organization's uploaded documents, newest first, and shows what each one needs next.
Summary Tiles
| Tile | Counts Documents That… |
|---|---|
| Awaiting analysis | Have no completed analysis yet. |
| Needs human review | Have flags that nobody has decided. |
| Ready for final decision | Have every flag decided, or no flags, but no final decision. |
| Returned or escalated | Were returned for follow-up or escalated. |
The four tiles are Awaiting analysis, Needs human review, Ready for final decision, and Returned or escalated. Documents whose review is completed are not counted in a tile.
Columns
| Column | What It Shows |
|---|---|
| Document | The uploaded file name. |
| Program | The program the document was uploaded to. |
| Analysis | Not started, Analyzing, Analysis complete, or Analysis failed. |
| Review progress | “Not analyzed yet”, “No flags raised”, or a count such as “2 of 5 flags reviewed”. |
| Human outcome | No decision, Review completed, Returned, or Escalated. |
| Uploaded | When the file was uploaded. |
| Action | Start review, Continue review, or View completed review. Each opens the Review Workspace. |
Filters
- Search file names — narrows the rows shown on the page.
- Program — all programs or one; archived programs are marked.
- Analysis and Human outcome — filter by status.
- Uploaded from / Uploaded to — a date range.
Counts and rows cover the 1,000 most recent documents. If you see that note, narrow the filters (for example by program or upload dates) to reach older documents.
Exporting the Queue
Click Export CSV to download documentation-review-documents.csv. It contains one row per document with these columns: Document, Program, Uploaded, Uploaded by, Analysis status, Outcome, Findings, Unresolved findings, Current decision, and Decision date.
- The export follows the Program, Analysis, Human outcome, and date filters. The file-name search applies on the page only and is not applied to the export.
- Statuses appear in the file as short codes rather than the on-screen labels, for example
completed,needs_attention, andapprove/return/escalate. - The export is limited to 1,000 rows.
10. Review Insights
Documentation Intelligence > Review Insights
Review Insights shows which criteria are flagged most often, how reviewers resolved them, and where review work is outstanding. Filter by Program and by upload date.
Summary Numbers
- Documents analyzed — documents with a completed analysis.
- Documents requiring attention — documents that still need flag review or a final decision.
- Unresolved flags — flags nobody has decided yet.
Panels
- Flag rate by criterion — the share of analyzed documents where each criterion was flagged.
- Reviewer dispositions — how many flags were Confirmed, Dismissed, Addressed, or are still Undecided.
- Outstanding review work — for each program, how many documents need human review and how many are ready for a final decision.
Criteria Detail
The table lists every flagged criterion with its Program, Severity, Flag rate, the number Confirmed, Dismissed, Addressed, and Undecided, and its Dismissal rate.
A criterion with a high dismissal rate is usually worded too broadly: reviewers keep deciding its flags do not apply. Tighten its reviewer guidance under Programs & Criteria. A criterion with a high flag rate and a high confirmed count points to a real documentation habit worth addressing through training.
Exporting Insights
Click Export CSV above the table to download documentation-review-common-findings.csv, with the columns Program, Rule code, Criterion, Category, Severity, Documents flagged, Documents analyzed, Confirmed, Dismissed, Resolved, and Undecided. In the file, “Rule code” is the Criterion code and “Resolved” is the count shown on screen as Addressed.
11. Limits & Good Practice
What to Know Before You Rely on a Result
- PDF only, 20 MB per file. Each PDF is analyzed individually.
- Scanned documents. Text recognition (OCR) is not guaranteed. Clear, straight, typed scans give the best results; faint or handwritten pages may be missed or returned as Not enough information.
- Password-protected PDFs. Remove the password before uploading so the content can be read.
- Your criteria, not a rulebook. There is no built-in regulatory or payer rule library. The module checks what your criteria ask for and nothing else.
- One document at a time. Each PDF is reviewed on its own. The module does not compare documents with each other, so it will not detect a note copied from another file.
- No duplicate detection. Uploading the same file twice creates two separate documents.
- Standalone. It does not read from or update Case Management, the Care Module, Billing Hub, an EHR, or a clearinghouse.
- Records are kept. Documents, analyses, and decisions cannot be deleted or edited from within the module.
Good Practice
- Check every flag against the cited page before deciding. The quoted evidence is AI-provided text.
- Treat “No issues flagged” as “nothing flagged against our criteria”, not as proof that a document is compliant.
- Use comments to record why a flag was dismissed. That reasoning is what makes the review useful later.
- Review your criteria regularly, especially after a rule or policy change, and re-run analysis on documents still under review.
- Upload only what your organization's privacy and records policies allow, and give module access only to staff who need it.
12. Common Workflows
Workflow 1: Monthly Chart Audit
- Export or scan the charts in your audit sample to PDF, one PDF per chart or per document, with clear file names.
- Go to Upload, select the program, add the PDFs, and click Upload and analyze.
- When the files show Ready for review, click Open Review Queue.
- Open each document with Start review, check each flag against its cited page, and confirm, dismiss, or mark it addressed.
- Record the final decision: Complete review, Return for follow-up, or Escalate review.
- Open Review Insights, filter to the audit period, and click Export CSV for your audit file.
Workflow 2: Pre-Billing Documentation Check
- Before notes are handed to billing, export the period's service notes as PDFs.
- Upload them to the program that holds your billing-related documentation criteria.
- In the Review Queue, work the Needs human review documents first.
- Return for follow-up any note with a confirmed gap, with a comment saying what must be corrected.
- Once the author has corrected the note, upload the corrected PDF as a new document and review it.
Documentation Intelligence does not hold, release, or submit claims, and it is not connected to Billing Hub. It tells your team which documents need attention; your billing process decides what happens next.
Workflow 3: Supervisor Quality Review
- Upload a sample of each staff member's notes, using file names that identify the author.
- Review the flags and record decisions with comments.
- Use Search file names in the Review Queue to pull up one person's documents for a supervision meeting.
- Use Review Insights to see which criteria are flagged most often across the team, and plan training around them.
Workflow 4: Applying Updated Criteria
- Open Programs & Criteria, edit the program, and click Save program. The revision number goes up.
- New uploads use the new revision automatically.
- For a document already analyzed, open it and click Re-run analysis. The workspace shows which revision each analysis used.
- Review the new flags and record decisions on the current analysis.
13. Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Documentation Compliance Checker decide whether a chart or note is compliant?
No. It compares each uploaded PDF with the review criteria your organization wrote and flags possible documentation gaps, with the page where it found the evidence. A person on your team checks each flag against the source document and records the decision. It does not determine compliance, billability, fraud, or clinical or legal sufficiency.
What kinds of files can I upload?
PDF files only, up to 20 MB each. You can select several PDFs at once; each one is stored and analyzed as its own document. Export or scan charts, service notes, plans, and other records to PDF before uploading.
Does it work on scanned or handwritten documents?
It can, but text recognition (OCR) is not guaranteed. A scan that is faint, skewed, or handwritten may come back as Not enough information, or the analysis may miss details. Always check the cited page yourself.
Does it come with Medicaid, waiver, or payer rules built in?
No. There is no built-in regulatory or payer rule library. Your organization writes its own programs and criteria under Programs & Criteria, based on the rules and policies that apply to you.
Does it read our Case Management notes or billing records automatically?
No. It is standalone. It only reviews PDFs that someone uploads, and it does not read from or write to Case Management, the Care Module, Billing Hub, an EHR, or any other system.
If we change our criteria, what happens to documents we already reviewed?
Nothing changes for them. Saving a program creates a new criteria revision that applies only to future analyses. Earlier results keep the criteria they were run with. To apply the new criteria to an existing document, open it and click Re-run analysis.
Why is the Complete review button disabled?
Every flag in the current analysis needs a decision first. Confirm, dismiss, or mark each flag addressed, and the button becomes available. Return for follow-up and Escalate review are available at any time.
Who can see the documents we upload?
Everyone in your organization who has a Documentation Intelligence role, and your organization's administrators. Documents are not limited to the person who uploaded them, and they are never visible to other organizations.
Can I delete a document after uploading it?
Not from within the module. Uploaded documents, analyses, and decisions are kept as a record. If a file was uploaded by mistake, contact One Care Portal support.
14. Quick Reference
| I Want To… | Go To |
|---|---|
| Open the module | Service Overview > Documentation Intelligence > Open Documentation Intelligence |
| Create or edit review criteria | Programs & Criteria > New program, or select a program |
| Retire a program | Programs & Criteria > select the program > clear the Active checkbox > Save program |
| Upload charts or notes | Upload > select program > add PDFs > Upload and analyze |
| See what needs review | Review Queue |
| Analyze a stored document | Review Queue > open the document > Analyze PDF |
| Apply new criteria to a document | Review Queue > open the document > Re-run analysis |
| Decide a flag | Review Workspace > Confirm flag, Dismiss flag, or Mark addressed |
| Finish a document | Review Workspace > Final decision > Complete review |
| Send a document back | Review Workspace > Final decision > Return for follow-up |
| See decision history | Review Workspace > Disposition history / Final decision history |
| See trends by criterion | Review Insights |
| Export documents or trends | Review Queue > Export CSV, or Review Insights > Export CSV |
| Give someone access | Manage Users > assign a Documentation Intelligence role (administrators) |
Need More Help?
Read the Documentation Compliance Checker overview for what the module is designed for, browse the other user guides, or contact support.